Home / Massachusetts / Exactly How New England’s Indian Population Was Nearly Wiped Out

Exactly How New England’s Indian Population Was Nearly Wiped Out

Even before European colonists nearly wiped out the Indian population in New England, war and disease had already begun their dirty work.

A team of anthropologists, economists and paleopathologists studied the health of the Indian population in the Western Hemisphere over 7,000 years. Native American health had declined even before Columbus came to the New World, they concluded in a book published in August 2017, The Backbone of History: Health and Nutrition in the Western Hemisphere.

The researchers found Indians’ health got worse because they came to depend on corn and because they began to live in denser communities, allowing infectious disease to spread quickly.

Still, the Indian population didn’t begin its catastrophic demise until the Europeans arrived in the 16th century.

indian-population-lamentation

Indians lament death by disease.

There were about 60,000 Indians living in New Hampshire, Massachusetts, Rhode Island and Connecticut at the beginning of the 17th century, according to Sherburne Cook. Maine had a robust population of Abenaki tribes – more than 20,000 Penobscot, Micmac and Passamaquoddy Indians -- by some estimates.

A century later, New England’s Indians were disappearing. Some tribes were already extinct.

This is how the Europeans nearly wiped out the Indian population.

Indian Population Before the Pilgrims

The seeds of the Indians’ destruction were planted more than a century before the Pilgrims set foot on Plymouth Rock.

In what is now Canada and Maine, contact with Europeans began even before English and French explorers showed up at the turn of the 17th century. In 1504, a French vessel was documented fishing the Grand Banks off Newfoundland in 1504. Portuguese fishermen arrived two years later.

indian-population-grand-banks

Early map of the Grand Banks.

By 1519, a hundred European ships made round trips to the Grand Banks. The first tourist cruise to North America sailed from London in 1536, but food ran short and many died.

The European visitors brought with them diseases to which the Indians had no immunity, including smallpox, measles, tuberculosis, cholera and bubonic plague.

Maine’s Passamaquoddy Indians, among the first to make contact with Europeans, were devastated by a typhus epidemic in 1586. Other diseases brought the Passamaquoddy population to 4,000 from 20,000.

The 1616 Plague

In 1616, a terrible plaque swept along the Massachusetts coast, wreaking the most devastation north of Boston. It’s not clear what it was – perhaps smallpox, perhaps yellow fever, perhaps bubonic plague.

Whatever it was, it was terrifying. So much of the Indian population died there weren’t enough left to bury the dead. English colonist Thomas Morton described the heaps of dead Indians 'a new found Golgotha.'

As many as 90 percent of the 4,500 Indians of the Massachusetts tribe perished. The disease cleared the Boston Harbor islands of inhabitants.

indian-population-john-smith

John Smith

English explorer John Smith had visited New England before the plague in 1614. He returned eight years later and was shocked by what he saw.

“God had laid this country open for us,” he wrote. “Where I had seen 100 or 200 people, there is scarce ten to be found.”

Disease persisted among the Massachusetts from 1620 to 1630, and there were only about 750 left when smallpox struck in 1633, obliterating entire villages. The Massachusetts who survived were herded into Christian villages of ‘praying Indians.’

Puritan minister Increase Mather wrote 'about this time [1631] the Indians began to be quarrelsome touching the Bounds of the Land which they had sold to the English, but God ended the Controversy by sending the Smallpox amongst the Indians of Saugust, who were before that time exceeding numerous.'

Along the Merrimack River in New Hampshire, raids by the Mohawks had already weakened the Pennacook Indians when the 1616 plague arrived. It killed three out of four Pennacook Indians.

That same plague almost completely obliterated two other Pennacook tribes in Massachusetts, the Agawam in Ipswich and the Naumkeag in Salem.

Wampanoags

The plague of 1616-1618 cleared nearly all the Wampanoag along the coast from Plymouth to Boston, but was far less severe south of Plymouth.

indian-population-williams-king-philip

King Philip

A year after the Pilgrims arrived, their Indian visitor Samoset told them, 'about foure yeares agoe, all the Inhabitants dyed of an extraordinary plague, and there is neither man, woman, nor childe remaining, as indeed we haue found none, so as there is none to hinder our possession, or to lay claime unto it.'

"Thousands of them died," wrote William Bradford, Plymouth's governor. "They not being able to bury one another, their skulls and bones were found in many places lying still above the ground."

Enough Wampanoag Indians survived to become the backbone of Indian resistance that led to King Philip’s War in 1675.

But disease persisted among the tribe, weakening them further. By the war’s outbreak, the Wampanoag population fell to 2,500 from as many as 5,500. Those who weren’t killed in the war were sold into slavery, moved to praying towns or migrated west. King Philip’s War virtually obliterated the Wampanoag.

Nauset and Narragansett

indian-population-roger-williams-narragansett

Roger Williams with Narragansett Indians

The Narragansett were the biggest tribe in New England, with 7,800 members including 300 on Block Island. Protected by Narragansett Bay, they didn’t come into contact with the white invaders as early or as frequently as northern tribes. They were unaffected by the great plague of 1616.

Because the Narragansetts were so much larger, Wampanoag leader Massasoit made peace with the Plymouth colonists to ally them against his Narragansett rivals.

The Narragansetts’ first epidemic was smallpox in 1633, which killed 700 of them. Chronic ailments further reduced their numbers to 5,000 by the outbreak of King Philip’s War. Wrote Roger Williams in 1643,

They commonly abound with children, and increase mightily; except the plague fall amongst them, or other lesser sicknesses, and then having no means of recovery, they perish wonderfully.

Infectious disease terrified the Narragansetts. “I have often seene a poore House left alone in the wild Woods, all being fled, the living not being able to bury the dead, so terrible is the apprehension of an infectious disease, that not only persons, but Houses and the whole Towne take flight,” wrote Williams.

The Narragansetts tried to stay out of King Philip’s War, but after English colonists massacred as many as 1,100 of them at the Great Swamp Fight in 1675, they had no choice but to fight. After King Philip’s War fewer than 500 Narragansetts remained. They were allowed to settle with the Eastern Niantic on a reservation at Charlestown, R.I., where they frequently intermarried with African-Americans and Indians from other tribes.

The Nauset, a tribe of about 8,000 on Cape Cod and the islands, were also apparently unaffected by the plague of 1616. But other diseases gradually reduced their numbers. The 2,100 Nausets on Cape Cod were down to 1,250 by 1700, and all had been converted to Christianity. By 1660, they had been driven into the Mashpee Reservation; the population of 2,100 Nausets fell to 1,250 by 1700.

Disease had also reduced the Indian population of 6,000 on Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket by more than half, to 2,330.

Connecticut's Indian Population

Before the English arrived, an Algonkian tribe that became the Pequots moved into Connecticut from the Connecticut River to the Rhode Island border, displacing the people who lived there. There were about 3,000 of them, and the population remained stable with little European contact and in the absence of war and severe epidemic disease.

indian-population-pequot-war

The Peqquot War

Then they were attacked by English colonists and Mohegan warriers in the Pequot War of 1637. Hundreds were killed or captured and hundreds more fled to southwestern Connecticut and Long Island. Only 200 were left by war’s end, and they were absorbed into the Mohegan tribe.

Shortly after the Pequot War in 1643, there were about 2,200 Pequot-Mohegans. Smallpox, flu, diphtheria and measles reduced their numbers to 750 by 1705. By then, they had already been herded into Connecticut reservations at Ledyard and Groton.

One Connecticut tribe tried to protect itself by building a fort. A thousand Mattabesic Indians sealed their fate when they enclosed themselves in a palisade fort in Hartford County. By 1634, smallpox and plague killed all but 50 of them with terrifying swiftness.

Of the 3,000 other Connecticut Indians in the vicinity – Podunk, Mattabesic, Hammonasset and Wongunk – most who survived sold their land and moved away.

Reservations

During the 17th century, life was short for the English colonists as well as the Indian population. By 1700, life expectancy in New England rose to 45-50 years, 15 years higher than in old England.

The Europeans had large families, and the colonist population grew 3 percent a year, doubling every 23 years. The land-hungry colonists pushed the remaining Indian population into warfare, and then into reservations and to parts west.

Before the Europeans arrived, there were about 10,000 Penobscot Indians in what is now Maine. The population collapsed from infectious diseases and fighting between the Mohawk over the fur trade. The Penobscot sided with the French during the French and Indian War, which the French lost decisively.

Both the Penobscot and the Passamaquoddy ceded their land to Massachusetts (which later became Maine); they were left only a reservation on Indian Island in Old Town, Maine. By 1800, there were only 500 Penobscot left.

Many Indians were converted to Christianity and moved to one of 14 praying towns. Indians were moved to reservations in Gay Head on Martha’s Vineyard and Fall River in Massachusetts.

During the 20th century, New England’s Indian population made a comeback. But that is a story for another day.

With thanks to The Indian Population of New England in the Seventeenth Century by S.F. Cook and to The Backbone of History: Health and Nutrition in the Western Hemisphere, edited by Richard H. Steckel, Jerome C. Rose.

 

3 comments

  1. Mary Ellen Lepionka

    The book and article on which this report is based are more than 15 years out of date, published in 2002, not 2017. Further, there is no book on indian population by a C. F. Cole, but there is one by C. F. Cook for the cited title, which was published in 1977–even more outdated. Your report thus does not reflect the most current research and interpretations. The Centers for Disease Control has identified the early epidemic, which actually started in 1611 in the Maritimes and ended in 1619 in southern New England, as leptospirosis, a bacterial contamination of fresh water and soil, brought by ship rats, carried by infected game, and acquired through physical contact. The report also does not reflect evidence that native populations rapidly recovered from infectious diseases intergenerationally through the dynamics of acquired immunity. In Massachusetts, for example, survivors of the smallpox epidemic of 1633 very likely have living descendants today. The idea that native populations had diseases prior to Contact should hold no surprise. It’s true of all populations everywhere. The report’s low pre-disease and post-disease population estimates are not corroborated in the current literature. There were more native people in New England than the report states, both before and after Contact, especially in the north. The report assumes that primary source descriptions of deaths from epidemics on the South Shore and Cape Cod (Bradford, Morton, Winthrop, etc.) apply equally to all regions in the Northeast. However, the North Shore and northern New England had significantly higher survival rates, largely due to geography. The fall line–the change in elevation that separates fresh from salt water on tidal rivers–was a disease barrier and is ever closer to the shore as you go north, with ever narrowing piedmonts, thus exposing fewer people in coastal population centers. Also, people traditionally moved inland, above the fall line, away from localities where sickness occurred, also reducing exposure to air-borne diseases. Agriculture was not practiced in more northerly latitudes, where the growing season was too short for corn, and population density was lower on the frontiers (northern and coastal Essex County MA and points north), so the diseases that spread in high-density corn-based population centers and through forced confinement on reservations was not a universal factor. Of course it cannot be denied there was a great and tragic “dying off” in general, especially in southern New England, but in no way were Native Americans ever in danger of extinction, except possibly through state-sponsored genocide. How about an article on that? Extinction through disease–the disappearance of the Indians–is a convenient fiction, one of the narratives of Erasure that have misinformed New Englanders all these 400 years. We were all told there were no Indians here when the English settled because they had all died off through disease or had killed each other off through internecine warfare. Your report, and the outdated material on which it is based, contributes to the perpetuation of this untruth.
    M. E. Lepionka, Co-chair, Gloucester Historical Commission; Trustee, Mass. Archaeological Society

    • You are right, the study was not by Cole, it was by Cook. We never claimed the Indian population is extinct. Perhaps you’d like to write that article for us?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*