Massachusetts

Mary Latham Marries an Older Man – And Regrets It

Around 1643, Mary Latham fell in love with a boy who rejected her. About 17 and impetuous, Mary Latham decided to marry the next man who asked. It was a bad decision.

Illustration: "Mary Dyer being led" by unknown 19th century artist - Brooklyn Museum

Illustration: "Mary Dyer being led" by unknown 19th century artist - Brooklyn Museum

Despite her friends' advice, she married a much older man, who had little to offer. She quickly grew dissatisfied with the marriage. What followed was the case of the only known execution in America for adultery.

What little we know of her comes from the diary of John Winthrop, governor of the Massachusetts Bay Colony.

Unhappy Marriage

Mary’s husband was “an ancient man who had neither honesty nor ability, and one whom she had no affection unto,” Winthrop writes.

“It was reported also that she did frequently abuse her husband, setting a knife to his breast and threatening to kill him, calling him old rogue and cuckold, and said she would make him wear horns as big as a bull,” wrote Winthrop.

“Whereupon, soon after she was married, divers young men solicited her chastity, and drawing her into bad company, and giving her wine and other gifts, easily prevailed with her.”

Now everything might have proceeded without a problem except Mary Latham took up with a man named John Britton. Britton, a professor in England,  came to the colonies, but he was not a Puritan.

“He opposed our church government, etc., and grew dissolute, losing both power and profession of godliness,” Winthrop wrote.  Britton was “a man ill affected both to our church discipline and civil government.”

Confessions

Britton also apparently couldn’t keep his mouth shut. He confessed to his affair with Mary Latham. The magistrates in Plymouth, where Mary lived, wasted no time in shipping her to Boston to face the charges against her.

At first, Mary Lataham denied the allegation. Britton had made advances, she said, but had not succeeded.

A witness against her said, “a company met at Britton's and there continued drinking sack, etc., till late in the night, and then Britton and the woman were seen upon the ground together, a little from the house.”

The jury found her guilty, and soon after that Mary confessed. She not only admitted the affair with Britton, but she named 12 other men, two of them married, that she had been with. The scandal produced a roundup of five of the men,though the others could not be found. The accused denied everything and for lack of witnesses or confessions they went free.

Mary Latham, however, had far less luck. The court sentenced her and Britton to death. Though a number of magistrates argued that death was not an appropriate punishment for adultery, they were outvoted.

Britton petitioned the court for a lesser sentence, but the court denied his request. Mary was penitent, and both stood a good chance of getting pardoned. Despite the strictness of the Puritan laws, criminals who repented often received pardons.

Winthrop concludes their story on March 21, 1644: “They were both executed, they both died very penitently, especially the woman, who had some comfortable hope of pardon of her sin, and gave good exhortation to all young maids to be obedient to their parents, and to take heed of evil company, etc.”

This story about Mary Latham was updated in 2017. 

6 Comments

6 Comments

  1. Kathy-Anne Whitehouse

    Kathy-Anne Whitehouse

    March 16, 2015 at 8:19 am

    No lynching for the other 12 concupiscent suitors…Hardly seems fair…

  2. Emily S Palmer

    Emily S Palmer

    March 16, 2015 at 9:20 am

    Is she by any chance daughter of Robert and Susanna Winslow Latham who were in court for mistreating their servant John Walker? I’m descended from their daughter Susanna who married John Howard.

    • Emily S Palmer

      Emily S Palmer

      March 16, 2015 at 12:47 pm

      Hi, cousin Dave, thanks. I’ve got enough troublemakers already in my family lines. Another one would be welcome.

    • Dave Sullivan

      Dave Sullivan

      March 16, 2015 at 1:13 pm

      Am willing & happy to collaborate with you. As you can see – your “new-found cuz” is a geane-nut.” Happy travels, and best to you in all things!

  3. Dave Sullivan

    Dave Sullivan

    March 16, 2015 at 12:45 pm

    Actually not cousin Emily S Palmer. Robert & Susanna (Winslow) Latham (my 8th GG parents & your ???th GG parents) didn’t have a daughter named Mary, but did have one named Mercy. The birth range of their children (including YOUR Susanna & my 7th GGfather Chilton) were from 1650 to 1673. This Mary Latham (born @ 1626) – I THOUGHT – was married to the constantly troublesome servant of John Carver’s family of Mayflower passage. – William Latham, who had no children. BUT … as genealogy goes … I certainly can be wrong about this. Am sure the New England Historical Society can tell us if THIS Mary’s maiden name was Latham or Dyer. Either way, it appears she was no relation to us, other than possibly by marriage. A ventured guess might be (if related), she was Robert Latham’s older sister – who may have arrived later on another ship? Think it all depends on what her maiden name was (as stated earlier). But hello “new found” cousin Emily S Palmer – none the less.

  4. Pingback: Speak Easy: Who Are You Related To? - Canyon News

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top