Home / Massachusetts / Thomas Faunce: The Man Who Saved Plymouth Rock

Thomas Faunce: The Man Who Saved Plymouth Rock

In 1741, Thomas Faunce of Plymouth, Massachusetts was concerned about the town’s plans to construct a new wharf. It would, he feared, mar the very spot where the Pilgrims first set foot in America.

The Landing of the Pilgrims, by Henry A. Bacon, 1877. Thomas Faunce recalled the location of Plymouth Rock in 1741, establishing it forever as a national landmark.

The Landing of the Pilgrims, by Henry A. Bacon, 1877.

So at age 94, the old man was carted down to the shoreline, carried in a chair. He pointed to the very rock the Pilgrims had first set foot on, and wept at the prospect that the rock was soon to be covered over by the wharf and lost forever.

Faunce, who had served as town clerk, was of the right age to know what he was talking about. His father had arrived just three years after the Mayflower aboard the ship Anne. As a child, Faunce said, the rock had been pointed out to him by several of the first settlers, and he had always remembered it – admonished by his grandmother to never forget that first fateful step that the Pilgrims made in America.

Of course, the first landing was actually Provincetown, but it was indeed Plymouth that the Pilgrims chose to call home.

Faunce’s designation of the rock has been questioned many times. There were multiple efforts at landing around Plymouth, there is no reference to any rock in the early accounts of the Pilgrim’s arrival and how could anyone be certain that Faunce’s recollection was even accurate as to what he was told as a child?

Nevertheless, the Pilgrim journey in America had to start somewhere and the town gave Plymouth Rock the official designation. Faunce was wrong in assuming that it would be lost, but over the years the rock has travelled a rough road. After he pointed it out, the townspeople elevated the rock to signify its status.

In 1774, some rebellious souls decided the rock would make the perfect platform for agitating against British rule, and they hauled the rock up from the shore to the town square where a Liberty Pole was constructed. There it was used as a stage to deliver speeches.

In the process, they split the rock nearly in half. It was later dropped again while being carted to a Pilgrim Hall museum and again broken.

In 1880, the two parts were rejoined and the rock returned to its home on the water, surrounded by wharves. 1620 was chiseled into its top. And in 1920, the tercentenary of the arrival of the Pilgrims, the rock was again spruced up and given a new portico.

Over the years, the rock has lost a great deal of weight. It’s estimated that half to as much as two-thirds of the rock are missing, taken by souvenir hunters who chipped off pieces or lost to breakage. Yet Faunce’s rock still survives, nearly 400 hundred years after the Pilgrims first stepped foot on it (or not).

This biography of the rock assembled from History of the Town of Plymouth by James Thacher and Pilgrim Hall Museum.

5 comments

  1. Mary Ellen Casey

    This is the first time I have read how “The Rock” was saved. Saw it along with my parent’s and 2 brothers long time ago.

  2. A great hope and inward zeal they had of laying some good foundation, or at least to make some way thereunto, for the propagating and advancing the gospel of the kingdom of Christ in those remote parts of the world; yea, though they should be but even as stepping-stones unto others for the performing of so great a work.” (William Bradford)

    “Now as the people of god in old time were called out of Babylon civil, the place of their bodily bondage, and were to come to Jerusalem, and there to build the Lord’s temple, or tabernacle…so are the people of God now to go out of Babylon spiritual to Jerusalem…and to build themselves as living stones into a spiritual house, or temple, for the Lord to dwell in.” (John Robinson)[1]

    Plymouth Rock has been largely discredited as the stepping stone that Pilgrims disembarked upon. In saying that the possibility that “Plymouth Rock” was placed or commissioned by surviving Pilgrims (Separatists) years possibly decades later in Plymouth should be studied.

    The purpose of its placement would have been to serve as a boundary marker, memorial, Thanksgiving Stone (as the Bible calls an Ebenezer Stone). This possibility is born out of William Bradford and Pastor John Robinson’s own words describing the congregation as being symbolized as stones. Daniel 2 also describes a heavenly community represented by a stone as ending the earthly system of rule by king. I believe that the Pilgrims believed that they were that stone in Daniel 2 and they left Plymouth Rock as an eschatological marker for future Christians to know the times they were in.

    Because of spending years and years practicing keeping a low profile in England and Holland and even in the New World this memorial would have gone unannounced. Buttressing this low profile would have been the damage that was done to Christendom early in Amsterdam and by one Leiden resident who made bold declarations about being the foundations of the “Earthly Kingdom Of Christ” riots ensued after their announcements. As residents of both Amsterdam and Leiden these events would have been well known to the Pilgrims causing them to avoid announcements like this.

    This would also explain Faunce’s story because the stone was placed to memorialize the arrival of the Pilgrims in Plymouth probably covering or in front of the place that the Pilgrims landed on after disembarking from the Mayflower. It also explains why a beach totally devoid of boulders would have a 200 ton rock on it. The Pilgrims would not have carved a 1620 in the rock because according to Biblical tradition these rock s must be uncarved by human hands.

    To verify this matter a geologist or person knowledgeable in these matters should search the locality of Plymouth to determine where such an uncarved boulder could have been dragged from. Also maybe an unexplainable non-descript expenditure in accounting records of Plymouth Plantation or the church or residents. Also a study verifying that such an undertaking could have been done with 17th century technology. This would be slightly different than the research done on Stonehenge because these rocks were quarried. Plymouth Rock would not have been quarried (for reasons I stated earlier).

    This memorial would have probably been placed during the time of several events that would have confirmed Daniel 2 in the minds of the surviving Pilgrims. The English Civil War, The Execution of King Charles or Cromwell’s rise to power.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*